花旗聘美前貿易代表萊特希澤獻策

The user wants a detailed analysis and professional report over 1000 words based on the title “國際財經 – 花旗已聘美國前貿易代表萊特希澤指點迷津”.
I need to perform a Google search to gather information about this topic, specifically focusing on why Citigroup hired Robert Lighthizer, what his role might be, and the implications of this move in the context of international finance and trade policy.

Based on the search results, I will structure the report as follows:

開頭吸引讀者 (Engaging Opening): Introduce the news about Citigroup hiring Lighthizer and its significance.

設定小標題 (Set Subheadings): Break down the analysis into logical sections.

正文邏輯遞進，層次分明 (Logical Progression, Clear Structure):

* Who is Robert Lighthizer? (His background as US Trade Representative)
* Why would Citigroup hire him? (Context of global trade tensions, policy shifts, need for expert advice)
* What challenges or opportunities might Lighthizer help Citigroup navigate? (US-China trade relations, supply chain issues, regulatory changes)
* Broader implications for the financial industry and international relations.

融入原文資料與事實 (Incorporate Source Material and Facts): Use information from the search results to support the analysis.

結尾有力總結，令人回味 (Powerful Conclusion): Summarize the key points and offer a final thought on the long-term impact.

Constraint Checklist & Confidence Score:

擅長繁體中文寫作: Yes

根據標題撰寫: Yes

1000字以上: Yes (Will aim for this)

深入淺出，避免枯燥: Yes

融入創意，引發共鳴: Yes

刪除開頭大標題: Yes

不要出現英文: Yes

結構要求: Yes (開頭、小標題、正文、結尾)

正文邏輯遞進: Yes

融入原文資料與事實: Yes (Will use search results)

Markdown格式輸出: Yes

必須繁體中文: Yes

不要附上來源/參考資料: Yes

直接回答問題: Yes

不要問候、客套、引導性語句: Yes

不要描述回答本身: Yes

僅包含與問題直接相關內容: Yes (The question is the title, so the content will be about that)

不要無關表達或語氣修飾: Yes

Confidence Score: 5/5

Mental Sandbox:

Initial thought: Just summarize the news piece. Problem: Not 1000+ words, not deep analysis.
Second thought: Expand on Lighthizer’s history and Citigroup’s business. Problem: Might become too generic.
Third thought: Focus on the intersection of trade policy and international finance. How does a global bank like Citigroup benefit from insights into trade negotiations and policy-making, especially from someone like Lighthizer who was at the forefront during a period of significant trade friction? This seems promising for a deep dive. I can discuss the ripple effects of trade policy on currency markets, supply chains, investment flows, and regulatory environments, all of which impact a global bank’s operations and strategy. Lighthizer’s experience with China trade issues is particularly relevant.

Key Learnings from Sandbox: The focus should be on *why* Citigroup needs this kind of expertise and *what* kind of challenges Lighthizer can help them with, tying it back to the world of international finance. I need to frame this within the current geopolitical and economic landscape.

Strategizing complete. I will now proceed with the search and then the writing process based on the refined structure and content plan.